Do authors of research funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research comply with its open access mandate?: A meta-epidemiologic study

infodocketGARY's bookmarks 2021-08-25

Summary:

Overall, we found that there was a significant decrease in the proportion of CIHR funded studies published as OA from 2014 compared to 2017, though this difference did not persist when comparing both 2014–2015 to 2016–2017. The primary limitation was the reliance of self-reported data from authors on CIHR funding status. We posit that this decrease may be attributable to CIHR’s OA policy change in 2015. Further exploration is warranted to both validate these studies using a larger dataset and, if valid, investigate the effects of potential interventions to improve the OA compliance, such as use of a CIHR publication database, and reinstatement of a policy for authors to immediately submit their findings to OA repositories upon publication.

Link:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0256577

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » infodocketGARY's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.canada oa.mandates oa.funders oa.journals oa.compliance oa.medicine oa.policies oa.studies oa.empirical

Date tagged:

08/25/2021, 14:52

Date published:

08/25/2021, 10:52