Growth rates of sequences governed by the squarefree properties of its translates
What's new 2025-12-02
Wouter van Doorn and I have uploaded to the arXiv my paper “Growth rates of sequences governed by the squarefree properties of its translates“. In this paper we answer a number of questions of Erdős} (Problem 1102 and Problem 1103 on the Erdős problem web site) regarding how quickly a sequence of increasing natural numbers can grow if one constrains its translates
to interact with the set
of squarefree numbers in various ways. For instance, Erdős defined a sequence
to have “Property
” if each of its translates
only intersected
in finitely many points. Erdős believed this to be quite a restrictive condition on
, writing “Probably a sequence having property P must increase fairly fast, but I have no results in this direction.”. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that in fact, while these sequences must be of density zero, they can grow arbitrary slowly in the sense that one can have
for all sufficiently large
and any specified function
that tends to infinity as
. For instance, one can find a sequence that grows like
. The density zero claim can be proven by a version of the Maier matrix method, and also follows from known moment estimates on the gaps between squarefree numbers; the latter claim is proven by a greedy construction in which one slowly imposes more and more congruence conditions on the sequence to ensure that various translates of the sequence stop being squarefree after a certain point.
Erdős also defined a somewhat complementary property , which asserts that for infinitely many
, all the elements
of
for
are square-free. Since the squarefree numbers themselves have density
, it is easy to see that a sequence with property
must have (upper) density at most
(because it must be “admissible” in the sense of avoiding one residue class modulo
for each
). Erdős observed that any sufficiently rapidly growing (admissible) sequence would obey property
but beyond that, Erd\H{o}s writes “I have no precise information about the rate of increase a sequence having property Q must have.”. Our results in this direction may also be surprising: we show that there exist sequences with property
with density exactly
(or equivalently,
). This requires a recursive sieve construction, in which one starts with an initial scale
and finds a much larger number
such that
is squarefree for most of the squarefree numbers
(and all of the squarefree numbers
). We quantify Erdős’s remark by showing that an (admissible) sequence will necessarily obey property
once it grows significantly faster than
, but need not obey this property if it only grows like
. This is achieved through further application of sieve methods.
A third property studied by Erd\H{o}s is the property of having squarefree sums, so that is squarefree for all
. Erdős writes, “In fact one can find a sequence which grows exponentially. Must such a sequence really increase so fast? I do not expect that there is such a sequence of polynomial growth.” Here our results are relatively weak: we can construct such a sequence that grows like
, but do not know if this is optimal; the best lower bound we can produce on the growth, coming from the large sieve, is
. (Somewhat annoyingly, the precise form of the large sieve inequality we needed was not in the literature, so we have an appendix supplying it.) We suspect that further progress on this problem requires advances in inverse sieve theory.
A weaker property than squarefree sums (but stronger than property ), referred to by Erdős as property
, asserts that there are infinitely many
such that all elements of
(not just the small ones) are square-free. Here, the situation is close to, but not quite the same, as that for property
; we show that sequences with property
must have upper density strictly less than
, but can have density arbitrarily close to this value.
Finally, we looked at a further question of Erdős on the size of an admissible set . Because the squarefree numbers are admissible, the maximum number
of elements of an admissible set
up to
(OEIS A083544) is at least the number
of squarefree elements up to
(A013928). It was observed by Ruzsa that the former sequence is greater than the latter for infinitely many
. Erdős asked, “Probably this holds for all large x. It would be of some interest to estimate A(x) as accurately as possible.”
We are able to show

However, we do not currently have enough numerical data for the sequence to completely confirm the conjecture in all cases. This could potentially be a crowdsourced project (similar to the Erdős-Guy-Selfridge project reported on in this previous blog post).