“No comment”?: A study of commenting on PLOS articles - White Rose Research Online

mdelhaye's bookmarks 2018-11-23

Summary:

Article commenting functionality allows users to add publically visible comments to an article on a publisher’s website. As well as facilitating forms of post-publication peer review, for publishers of open-access mega-journals (large, broad scope, OA journals that seek to publish all technically or scientifically sound research) comments are also thought to serve as a means for the community to discuss and communicate the significance and novelty of the research, factors which are not assessed during peer review. In this paper we present the results of an analysis of commenting on articles published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS), publisher of the first and best-known mega-journal PLOS ONE, between 2003 and 2016. We find that while overall commenting rates are low, and have declined since 2010, there is substantial variation across different PLOS titles. Using a typology of comments developed for this research we also find that only around half of comments engage in an academic discussion of the article, and that these discussions are most likely to focus on the paper’s technical soundness. Our results suggest that publishers have yet to encourage significant numbers of readers to leave comments, with implications for the effectiveness of commenting as a means of collecting and communicating community perceptions of an article’s importance.

Link:

http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138717/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » mdelhaye's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.plos oa.megajournals oa.peer_review

Date tagged:

11/23/2018, 02:57

Date published:

11/22/2018, 21:57