The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot

flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks 2020-07-07

Summary:

Authors: Lisa Olsson, Helena Francke, Camilla Hertil Lindelöw, Niklas Willén

Abstract: In this paper we summarise the lessons learned from the first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: Springer Compact with Springer Nature (2016-07-01 – 2018-12-31). We set out to put the Swedish agreement in an international context and to examine the effects of the agreement regarding economy, publication outcome, administration and researchers’ attitudes and practices in Sweden. Publication data, economic data, as well as survey data from administrative staff and corresponding authors were collected and analysed. Based on the analyses, the advantages and disadvantages of Read & Publish agreements are discussed. The advantages include increase in OA publishing, improved OA workflows and ease for researchers. The disadvantages include the risk of conserving the current system and its associated high costs.

Link:

https://www.liberquarterly.eu/article/10.18352/lq.10309/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.liber_quarterly oa.sweden oa.europe oa.business_models oa.agreements oa.evaluation oa.springer_nature oa.bibliometrics oa.bibsam oa.offsets oa.economics_of oa.risks oa.benefits

Date tagged:

07/07/2020, 04:33

Date published:

07/07/2020, 00:33