Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 — Preliminary Report
Zotero / K4D COVID-19 Health Evidence Summaries Group / Top-Level Items 2020-09-23
Type
Journal Article
Author
The RECOVERY Collaborative Group
URL
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
Rights
Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Publication
New England Journal of Medicine
Date
17/07/2020
Loc. in Archive
world
Extra
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
Library Catalog
www.nejm.org
Language
en
Abstract
Background
Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage. Glucocorticoids may modulate inflammation-mediated lung injury and thereby reduce progression to respiratory failure and death.
Methods
In this controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19, we randomly assigned patients to receive oral or intravenous dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Here, we report the preliminary results of this comparison.
Results
A total of 2104 patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone and 4321 to receive usual care. Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110 patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.93; P<0.001). The proportional and absolute between-group differences in mortality varied considerably according to the level of respiratory support that the patients were receiving at the time of randomization. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs. 41.4%; rate ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs. 26.2%; rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14.0%; rate ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.55).