Lockdown measures in response to COVID-19 in nine sub-Saharan African countries
Zotero / K4D COVID-19 Health Evidence Summaries Group / Top-Level Items 2020-10-26
Type
Journal Article
Author
Najmul Haider
Author
Abdinasir Yusuf Osman
Author
Audrey Gadzekpo
Author
George O. Akipede
Author
Danny Asogun
Author
Rashid Ansumana
Author
Richard John Lessells
Author
Palwasha Khan
Author
Muzamil Mahdi Abdel Hamid
Author
Dorothy Yeboah-Manu
Author
Leonard Mboera
Author
Elizabeth Henry Shayo
Author
Blandina T. Mmbaga
Author
Mark Urassa
Author
David Musoke
Author
Nathan Kapata
Author
Rashida Abbas Ferrand
Author
Pascalina-Chanda Kapata
Author
Florian Stigler
Author
Thomas Czypionka
Author
Alimuddin Zumla
Author
Richard Kock
Author
David McCoy
URL
https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/10/e003319
Rights
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
e003319
Publication
BMJ Global Health
ISSN
2059-7908
Date
2020/10/01
Extra
Publisher: BMJ Specialist Journals
Section: Analysis
PMID: 33028699
DOI
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003319
Accessed
2020-10-26 08:05:05
Library Catalog
gh.bmj.com
Language
en
Abstract
Lockdown measures have been introduced worldwide to contain the transmission of COVID-19. However, the term ‘lockdown’ is not well-defined. Indeed, WHO’s reference to ‘so-called lockdown measures’ indicates the absence of a clear and universally accepted definition of the term ‘lockdown’. We propose a definition of ‘lockdown’ based on a two-by-two matrix that categorises different communicable disease measures based on whether they are compulsory or voluntary; and whether they are targeted at identifiable individuals or facilities, or whether they are applied indiscriminately to a general population or area. Using this definition, we describe the design, timing and implementation of lockdown measures in nine countries in sub-Saharan Africa: Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. While there were some commonalities in the implementation of lockdown across these countries, a more notable finding was the variation in the design, timing and implementation of lockdown measures. We also found that the number of reported cases is heavily dependent on the number of tests carried out, and that testing rates ranged from 2031 to 63 928 per million population up until 7 September 2020. The reported number of COVID-19 deaths per million population also varies (0.4 to 250 up until 7 September 2020), but is generally low when compared with countries in Europe and North America. While lockdown measures may have helped inhibit community transmission, the pattern and nature of the epidemic remains unclear. However, there are signs of lockdown harming health by affecting the functioning of the health system and causing social and economic disruption.