Trends In Percutaneous Device Use For The Treatment Of Venous Thromboembolism Over Time In The PINC AI Healthcare Database And The National Inpatient Sample

Am J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 17:S0002-9149(24)00274-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.014. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The number of different methodologies of reperfusion therapy to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) has increased substantially. Nevertheless, investigation of data representativeness and device-level usage in administrative databases has been limited. Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the PINC AI Healthcare Database (PHD), all hospital encounters with a diagnosis code of VTE were identified between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2020. Patient demographics and trends in treatment modalities were evaluated over time. An algorithm was developed to identify specific devices used for VTE treatment in the PHD cohort. 145,870 VTE patients treated with reperfusion therapy were identified in the NIS (Pulmonary embolism (PE): 88,725; isolated DVT (iDVT): 57,145) and 39,311 in the PHD (PE: 25,383; iDVT: 13,928). Patient demographics were qualitatively similar in the NIS and PHD. Over time, there was a significant increase in the use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the PE and iDVT populations (p<0.05 in both databases) with catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) use plateauing in PE (p=0.83 and p=0.14 in NIS and PHD respectively) and significantly decreasing for the iDVT population (p<0.05 in both databases). In the PHD cohort, specific reperfusion devices were identified in 14,105 patients (PE: 9,098; iDVT: 5,007). In conclusion, the use of MT for the treatment of VTE has increased over time, while rates of CDT therapy have remained stagnant or decreased. Further research is needed to understand the uptake of these treatment modalities as well as the unique abilities of the PHD to study specific device therapy in the VTE population.

PMID:38641190 | DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.014