A disproportionality analysis of nifedipine in the overall population and in pregnant women using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Oct 31;104(44):e45113. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000045113.

ABSTRACT

Nifedipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is widely used in the management of hypertension and as a tocolytic agent to delay preterm labor, including in pregnant women. However, its safety profile, particularly in pregnant populations, remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to evaluate adverse event (AE) signals associated with nifedipine use, with a specific focus on pregnancy-related outcomes. Nifedipine-related AEs reported in U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database (Q1 2004-Q4 2024) were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using 4 established signal detection methods: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Pregnancy-related reports were identified using Standardized MedDRA Queries, and subgroup analyses were conducted for pregnant women. In the overall population, significant signals at the System Organ Class level were observed for pregnancy-related conditions, vascular disorders, and cardiac disorders. The strongest prominent preferred term signal was gingival hypertrophy (n = 52; ROR = 100.55, PRR = 100.23, information component [IC] = 6.61, empirical Bayesian geometric mean [EBGM] = 97.42). Among pregnant women, prominent signals at the System Organ Class level included vascular disorders, respiratory disorders, and cardiac disorders. The strongest preferred term signal was acute pulmonary edema (n = 27; ROR = 67.23, PRR = 66.70, IC = 5.87, EBGM = 58.29), followed by cardiogenic shock (n = 11; ROR = 41.80, PRR = 41.67, IC = 5.26, EBGM = 38.25), pulmonary edema (n = 51; ROR = 38.57, PRR = 38.00, IC = 5.14, EBGM = 35.15), and hypoxia (n = 28; ROR = 20.62, PRR = 20.46, IC = 4.29, EBGM = 19.62). Several unexpected pregnancy-related AEs were also detected, including eclampsia, fetal distress, placental disorders, and intrauterine growth restriction. This study identified unexpected AE signals associated with nifedipine use during pregnancy. The findings offer valuable insights to guide clinical decision-making and promote safer use of nifedipine in pregnant populations.

PMID:41261676 | PMC:PMC12582688 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000045113