A Possible Fix For Scientific (and Academic) Publishing | Peer Review - News and Blog

Items tagged with oa.floss in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) 2022-08-08

Summary:

"This is a proposal for a software platform that may help the academic community solve these problems, and more.... Peer Review [the proposed platform] allows scholars, scientists, academics, and researchers to self organize their own peer review and refereeing, without needing journal editors to manually mediate it. The platform allows review and refereeing to be crowdsourced, using a reputation system tied to academic fields to determine who should be able to offer review and to referee. The platform splits pre-publish peer review from post-publish refereeing. Pre-publish review then becomes completely about helping authors polish their work and decide if their articles are ready to publish. Refereeing happens post-publish, and in a way which is easily understandable to the lay reader, helping the general public sort solid studies from shakey ones.   Peer Review is being developed open source. The hope is to form a non-profit to develop it which would be governed by the community of academics who use the platform in collaboration with the team of software professionals who build it (a multi-stakeholder cooperative)...."

Link:

https://blog.peer-review.io/we-might-have-a-way-to-fix-scientific-publishing

From feeds:

[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.floss in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.academic_led in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.infrastructure in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.recommendations oa.peer_review oa.open_peer_review oa.no-fee oa.lay oa.crowd publishing academic_led platforms open_source_software

Date tagged:

08/08/2022, 09:22

Date published:

08/08/2022, 05:22