What can research data repositories learn from open access? Part 1 | JISC DataPool Project

Items tagged with oa.eprints in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) 2012-09-05

Summary:

“Institutional research data repositories follow in the wake of the widespread adoption of open access repositories across UK institutions during the last decade. What can these new repositories learn from the experiences of open access, and what pointers can we find for the development of data repositories? ...  Open access (OA) repositories, which principally provide free access to an author’s version of published research papers, effectively began with the physics arXiv in 1991. Institutional repositories, which switch the focus of coverage from the subject to the place of authorship, emerged in 2001 following the Open Archives Initiative (OAI). To complete the record, the term ‘open access’ was defined by the Budapest Open Access Initiative(BOAI) in 2002.  So institutional OA repositories have up to a decade head start on proposed institutional research data repositories. The University of Southampton, home of the DataPool project, has hosted a leading OA repository since 2005, so the project team has long experience of running a repository.  As with OA repositories, there are plenty of examples of subject-focussed research data repositories, but here we focus on factors affecting institutional repositories (IRs).  For OA IRs, technology and infrastructure preceded policy. First impressions are that for data IRs this will be the other way round. As with OA, data policies in the UK are being driven both by research funders and institutions.  OA policies focus on the need to expand full-text content collections held in repositories and typically require (mandate) or encourage authors to deposit versions of their published papers...  It has been calculated that OA mandate policies can increase deposit rates to above 60% of eligible papers from the average of 20%. In this respect, the lack of a suitable policy could be seen to hinder an institutional OA repository.  Emerging UK institutional data polices by comparison have focussed on requiring researchers to create data management plans and data records, and emphasise sustainable practices in managing and storing data for the purpose of access, stopping short of requiring open access or of institutional deposit of actual data that would then need to be supported by the institution. This might be because institutions have still to calculate and cost the the storage infrastructure needed, whether managed locally or in the ‘cloud’, because institutions are unclear what value they can bring to data management – or even where the value is in the data they seek to help support, or because there is not yet any consensus on whether data repositories should be subject-based, or institutional, an issue which OA repositories have still not fully resolved. Institutional data policies have in turn been driven and directed by research funders’ data policies, principally RCUK and EPSRC (Jones 2012) setting principles and expectations of institutional compliance within a specified timescale (for EPSRC, by 2015).  the few early policies available suggest little common purpose – we are clearly some way from having a best-practice data policy template for others to follow, as has evolved for OA repositories. To serve even the limited requirements of these early policies, institutions will need to connect decisions on infrastructure and understand patterns of workflow that produce research data, as we shall see below...”

Link:

http://blog.soton.ac.uk/datapool/2012/05/24/what-can-research-data-repositories-learn-from-open-access-part-1/

From feeds:

[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.eprints in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.universities oa.sustainability oa.southampton.u oa.repositories.disciplinary oa.repositories.data oa.repositories oa.rdm oa.rcuk oa.policies oa.oai-pmh oa.oai oa.metadata oa.mandates oa.libraries oa.librarians oa.jisc oa.ir oa.infrastructure oa.history_of oa.hei oa.harvesting oa.green oa.funders oa.figshare oa.epsrc oa.encouragement oa.ecrystals oa.economics_of oa.dryad oa.deposits oa.definitions oa.declarations oa.datapool oa.datacite oa.data oa.curation oa.costs oa.compliance oa.comment oa.cloud oa.boai oa.arxiv oa.data oa.policies oa.comment oa.repositories oa.mandates oa.green oa.universities oa.libraries oa.ir oa.declarations oa.repositories.disciplinary oa.costs oa.sustainability oa.librarians oa.infrastructure oa.funders oa.repositories.data oa.data.management oa.oai-pmh dspace eprints preservation

Date tagged:

09/05/2012, 20:07

Date published:

09/05/2012, 16:07