Storm over science: predatory practices and the fight for research reliability | microLife | Oxford Academic

Susanne_van_Rijn's bookmarks 2026-06-01

Summary:

Scientific publishing faces a credibility crisis driven to a very large extent by predatory journals, paper mills, and exploitative open-access (OA) practices. Structural pressures—publish-or-perish culture, mandatory OA policies, and author publication charges-driven business models—fuel the proliferation of low-quality or fraudulent research, now exacerbated by artificial intelligence-generated content. This opinion, which aligns with a growing clamour from the research community—calls for an international journal accreditation system, guided by a transparent code of conduct and enforced by funding agencies, to restore integrity, prioritize quality over quantity for professional progression, and safeguard trust in scientific communication.

Link:

https://academic.oup.com/microlife/article/doi/10.1093/femsml/uqaf029/8281979?searchresult=1

Updated:

06/01/2026, 08:26

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Susanne_van_Rijn's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.journals oa.ai oa.copyfraud oa.negative oa.plagiarism oa.predatory oa.misconduct

Date tagged:

06/01/2026, 12:26

Date published:

10/11/2025, 08:26