Not in our name: Academics oppose publishers, support photocopying - Firstpost

abernard102@gmail.com 2013-04-27

Summary:

"Authors and teachers have joined the battled against publishers who have challenged Delhi University and a licensed photocopy store on DU campus, claiming copyright infringement for selling photocopies of compilations of reference books (known as course packs) to students. The case filed by Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis, in August, has attracted widespread attention for its far-reaching implications for students and their access to content across India. Earlier this month, teachers and academics under the banner Society for Promoting Educational Access and Knowledge or SPEAK were permitted by the High Court to become party to case as defendents making it “abundantly clear that they are dissociating themselves from the law-suit and that publishers were not really speaking in their name.” Prior to the impleading themselves in the case, over 300 teachers and authors signed a letter to publishing houses, requesting them withdraw their petition. (Read full letter here)  The list of those who signed the letter included 33 professors and authors who were specifically mentioned in the petition by publishers as being among those whose books formed part of some of the ‘course packs’ that were being sold at DU.

'As academics and authors we believe that the wider circulation of our work will only result in a richer academic community and it is unfortunate that you would choose to alienate teachers and students who are indeed your main readers and we urge you to consider withdrawing this petition,' the letter stated.  Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Kolkata’s National University of Juridical Sciences Shamnad Basheer, who is among those leading the campaign by teachers, rejects the claim that course packs eat into revenue of publishers.  'They do not impact the copyright owner because it is not students who buy these textbooks anyway. These textbooks are super expensive,' he says.  Course packs, Basheer explains, do not reproduce entire textbooks but only take small portions of each textbook.  'I want to expose my students to a wide variety of topics so that we can engage with a wide variety of topics. For that I need to reproduce small portions from different books. A course-pack in no way impacts the market for books and should be seen as a valid educational exercise. And the Copyright Act clearly exempts this educational exercise from infringement. It says that anything done in the ‘course of instruction’ is exempt from copyright infringement,' says Basheer.  But publishers have challenged that claim in the High Court ..."

Link:

http://www.firstpost.com/india/not-in-our-name-academics-oppose-publishers-support-photocopying-731433.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.licensing oa.comment oa.advocacy oa.copyright oa.india oa.students oa.litigation oa.textbooks oa.prices oa.fair_use oa.taylor&francis oa.oup oa.cup oa.delhi.u oa.speak oa.books oa.libre oa.south

Date tagged:

04/27/2013, 10:28

Date published:

04/27/2013, 06:28