Two short observations on AAAS and open access | Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week

abernard102@gmail.com 2015-05-19

Summary:

"Matt drew my attention to an old paper I’d not seen before: Riggs (1903) on the vertebral column of Brontosaurus. The page I linked there shows only the first page (which in fact is half a page, since Riggs’ work is only in the right column). Why only the first page? As Matt put it, 'It’s been 110 years, just give us the PDF already. And they wonder (do they wonder?) why people don’t rush to embrace their stumbling broken halting limping steps toward OA.' That’s exactly right. AAAS allows anyone to read the old Science papers anyway (good for them, as far as it goes), so why all the poxing about with registration? Just make it actual open access, as if you were good guys. So, two observations, as promised. First, here’s Matt’s observation: even making users register betrays a way of thinking wrongly about the material ... And here’s mine: I sometimes wonder whether we’re headed for a world where the meaningful scientific literature is going to be from 1660-1923 and from 2010 onwards, with a big gap from 1924 to 2009 that just gets ignored. Because it’s the literature not old enough to be out of copyright but not new enough to be OA."

Link:

http://svpow.com/2015/05/18/two-short-observations-on-aaas-and-open-access/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.publishers oa.business_models oa.societies oa.aaas oa.policies

Date tagged:

05/19/2015, 07:32

Date published:

05/19/2015, 03:32