Issue Brief: GSU Fair Use Decision Recap and Implications 2012-06-01


Use the link above to access the full text of the issue brief from the Association of Research Libraries.  The Executive Summary reads as follows: “The case concerns the use at Georgia State University (GSU) of electronic course reserves and electronic course sites to make excerpts from academic books available online to students enrolled in particular courses. The named plaintiffs in the case are three academic publishers (Oxford University Press, Cambridge  University Press, and Sage), but an early filing in the case confirmed that the lawsuit was in fact being funded 50% by the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) and 50% by the Association of American Publishers (AAP). The plaintiffs argued that the unlicensed posting of digital excerpts for student access almost always exceeded fair use and should require a license.  Although the decision is certainly not perfect (the use of bright line rules for appropriate amount under factor 3 is particularly troubling), Judge Evans has written a thorough and thoughtful analysis of the issues, and her opinion represents an overwhelming victory for Georgia State individually, a major defeat for the plaintiff publishers and for the AAP and CCC, and overall a positive development for libraries generally. The substance of the opinion is not ideal, but it is far more generous than the publishers have sought, it establishes a 

very comfortable safe harbor for fair use of books on e-reserve, and libraries 

remain free to take more progressive steps."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) »

Tags: oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.licensing oa.libass oa.copyright oa.societies oa.libraries oa.litigation oa.librarians oa.aap oa.fair_use oa.funders oa.sage oa.arl oa.oup oa.ccc oa.georgia.state.u oa.issue_brief oa.cup oa.libre

Date tagged:

06/01/2012, 14:44

Date published:

06/01/2012, 10:44