The Year in Science Publishing | The Scientist Magazine®

abernard102@gmail.com 2013-12-30

Summary:

The life-science community witnessed the launch and expansion of several preprint servers this year, providing new homes for unpublished research. PeerJ’s PrePrints and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory’s bioRxiv are but two of the places life scientists can now deposit fresh data for public viewing and discussion. This year, the two servers joined a growing list of web resources for the dissemination of non-peer-reviewed literature. Reviewing peer review The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) effectively mainstreamed the practice of post-publication peer review with its launch of PubMed Commons this year. PubMed Commons allows researchers to comment on one another’s work once it has been published and indexed online ... It was a mixed bag for the open access (OA) movement this year, which welcomed several developments—such as the launch of new journal titles as well as university-wide and federal initiatives—and suffered at least one black eye—a highly publicized, although disputed, 'sting' by a reporter forScience.  But for as much resistance as OA proponents have faced in the last 12 months, the movement has made significant strides, propelling itself into the U.S. and U.K. legislature."

Link:

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/38652/title/The-Year-in-Science-Publishing/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.data oa.gold oa.comment oa.government oa.mandates oa.usa oa.legislation oa.green oa.peer_review oa.uk oa.quality oa.preprints oa.credibility oa.peerj oa.fastr oa.biorxiv oa.pubmed_commons oa.repositories oa.policies oa.versions oa.journals

Date tagged:

12/30/2013, 15:56

Date published:

12/30/2013, 10:55