The Wellcome Trust's Deep Pockets - Open Access Archivangelism

abernard102@gmail.com 2014-03-24

Summary:

"All this potential research money wasted — utterly wasted — on Fools Gold. Some Reflection from Wellcome Would be Welcome.Falk Reckling: If Green OA would really work (Fools Green?), we would not need such compromises, but some of them could work: http://ioppublishing.org/newsDetails/Austria-open-accessThere's no 'Fools Green' just foolish OA policy (or non-policy). Green OA works perfectly well when it is effectively mandated (as it is by FRS in Belgium, U Liège, U Minho and others; see ROARMAP). FWF, for example, fails to (1) mandate immediate institutional deposit, irrespective of publisher embargo on OA, and fails to (2) make research evaluation and funding contingent on immediate institutional deposit, as the effective Green OA mandates do. This effectively makes compliance with the FWF 'mandate' completely contingent on publisher policy. OeAW does much the same.It may seem more sensible to pay for Fools Gold than to think, pay attention to the empirical evidence, and design an effective policy, but in fact it's a regrettable and needless waste of time and money.See:Optimizing the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) Open Access Mandate: I & II"

Link:

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1101-The-Wellcome-Trusts-Deep-Pockets.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » pontika.nancy@gmail.com's bookmarks

Tags:

ru.sparc oa.wellcome oa.funders oa.funders.private

Authors:

nospam@example.com (Stevan Harnad)

Date tagged:

03/24/2014, 23:30

Date published:

03/24/2014, 04:37