Friday levity: More CO2 will be better.

Scientific American - Energy & Sustainability 2013-05-10

Summary:

[caption id="attachment_1267" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Image: Zmie Science"] [/caption]Since we were discussing the differences between "skeptics" and "deniers" (or "denialists", whatever you want to call them) the other day this piece is timely. The Wall Street Journal is not exactly known for reasoned discussion of climate change, but this Op-Ed piece may set a new standard even for its own naysayers and skeptics. It's a piece by William Happer and Harrison Schmitt that's so one-sided, sparse on detail, misleading and ultimately pointless that I am wondering if it's a spoof. [More] Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Reddit Add to Facebook Add to del.icio.us Email this Article

Link:

http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=7ead2fc70500a2671824888cb33a53f4

From feeds:

Berkeley Law Library -- Reference & Research Services ยป Scientific American - Energy & Sustainability

Tags:

energy & sustainabilitymore science

Date tagged:

05/10/2013, 15:10

Date published:

05/10/2013, 15:03