Tech has made it more straightforward to faux medical effects. Is a cultural shift required to mend the issue? - Pioneer Chronicle

"No longer handiest can open science scale back the probabilities of misconduct, however it may be a very good useful resource for fellow scientists, and a approach to building up public consider within the medical procedure. In step with the open science efforts, some scientists are suggesting that people will have to have the ability to be offering post-publication feedback on papers, versus having a static assessment procedure that ends after e-newsletter. This may permit each reader to factor feedback and comments, maintaining the paper underneath consistent “reside” assessment. Whilst some journals — akin to eLife — lately permit post-publication comments, platforms like PubPeer permit scientists to go looking and go away feedback on papers from any magazine."