Flipping journals to open: Rethinking publishing infrastructure in light of Lingua/Glossa case | Impact of Social Sciences

openacrs's bookmarks 2021-09-22

Summary:

The resignation of the editorial board of an Elsevier-owned linguistics journal and its open access reorganization could get the ball rolling for other journals to follow suit. Benedikt Fecher and Gert Wagner argue this case is a reminder that open access means more than just providing access to an article; it means rethinking the whole process of publishing. Open access also raises important questions about who owns the critical information infrastructure for online publishing. Two weeks ago, the entire editorial board of the journal Lingua quit and announced they would launch a new journal named Glossa. Lingua’s executive editor Johan Rooryck said the reason for the resignation was that Elsevier, which publishes Lingua, did not comply with the editors’ request to turn the journal into an open access publication. Lingua has existed since 1949 and is among the top-3 linguistic journals on Google Scholar. The Lingua/Glossa case is a good opportunity to reflect upon our understanding of open access.

Link:

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/12/03/seizing-the-moment-is-our-understanding-of-open-access-too-shortsighted/

Updated:

09/22/2021, 13:16

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » openacrs's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.journals oa.conversions oa.business_models oa.fees oa.publishers oa.infrastructure oa.case oa.case.journals oa.gold

Date tagged:

09/22/2021, 17:16

Date published:

12/03/2015, 12:16